What RFK jr. actually said was it was “a possibility”. He told USA Today that his spasmodic dysphonia “could be” due to taking flu shots. That’s cautious. That’s responsible. He stated in an interview that he took annual flu shots until the mid-1990s, then stopped in 2005 “when I began looking at the side effects.”

“I was preparing litigation against some of the flu shots several years ago and one of the entries that was listed on a lot of them was spasmodic dysphonia, which is an injury I have to my voice. That’s why my voice is so screwed up.” “

Do I know it was caused by the annual flu shot? I have no idea.”

When pressed by the interviewer, who asked if he suspected it was caused by the vaccine, he said it’s “a possibility.”

“It’s a potential culprit that I cannot rule out, but I can’t prove it,” he said. “I’d like to know. We should have that data but we don’t.”

MedPage Today flunkeys round on him again with a supposed analysis of the package inserts for the most popular flu vaccines showed that “none of them listed spasmodic dysphonia — or laryngeal dystonia, an alternative name for the condition — as a side effect.” 

Of course what they omit is that the warning WAS on the package inserts. It’s been removed.

Only one flu shot, FluLaval, listed “dysphonia” as a potential respiratory symptom, but this shot was approved in 2006, after Kennedy said he stopped taking flu shots. Of course this is tricky wording to make RFK look stupid or mistaken. But to me they shoot themselves in the foot. If this type of vaccine is shown to definitely cause spasmodic dysphonia, then it makes it very likely that the one RFK was subjected to would also cause the condition.

They’ve just covered it up, as they do.

That great conman Paul Offit, MD, of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who co-invented a rotavirus vaccine, takes a different line. He said package inserts typically mention any side effect that came up in a clinical trial, even if it was later shown not to be tied to the vaccine.

“Package inserts … are written by lawyers at companies in collaboration with lawyers at the FDA, and they fall under the general rubric of ‘failure to warn,'” Offit said. “They want to make sure that anything that was reported in the vaccinated group gets reported as a possible cause, even if it occurs at the same level in the placebo group.”

I doubt most honest or scientifically-minded doctors would declare the package inserts as bogus or misleading!

And guess what? When Offit’s own rotavirus vaccine RotaTeq® was in trial there were nine seizures in the vaccine group and two in the placebo group, “which was statistically significant.” Very significant. That should have stopped the product right there… but it didn’t of course. Too much money invested in development.

But once that vaccine was rolled out and given to millions of people,” claims Offit, “…You saw the incidence was the same in both groups.” Wonderful isn’t it, how cleverly drug manufacturers cause problem to simply disappear.

There are in fact many side-effects of RotaTeq®, most of them mild, like tummy upsets. But there are some very serious life-threatening problems, notably intussusception. This is a bowel obstruction where one part of the intestine literally “telescopes” (slides inside) into another. It’s not common but there is an increased risk after rotavirus vaccines, concentrated mostly in the first week (or up to ~21 days) after the first dose.

Also serious are sudden episodic severe abdominal pain/crying, vomiting, blood in stool (“currant jelly” stool), marked lethargy. If those show up after vaccination, clinicians generally want the baby assessed urgently. It rapidly becomes fatal.

More controversially Kawasaki disease was reported after RotaTeq® in post-marketing experience (so it appears in manufacturer safety language and labeling summaries).

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a rare, acute illness causing vasculitis (inflammation of blood vessels), primarily affecting children under 5. It is the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children in developed countries, characterized by persistent high fever (?5 days), rash, red eyes, swollen hands/feet, and strawberry tongue.

When researchers have looked systematically, reviews generally find low incidence and no convincing association, while also noting the need for large datasets. As I said, Big Pharma has this convenient way of making problems disappear and become “unproven” (by their own standards of course).

And there is another not-to-be-discussed problem, which is that live vaccines (RotaTeq® is live) will inevitably shed pathogens on the population and cause a lot of collateral sickness. Of course they consider that part of the price to pay, an entitlement of theirs, to make the population “safe”. The trouble is, children who are immune-compromized, through no fault of their  own, are thrown under the bus.

I’m not saying all this so much as to attack Offit (a man I revile) but to show the hypocrisy and double-science they use to try and discredit anyone who stands in the way of their obscene profits. Every statement of Kennedy’s is opposed, taken apart and supposedly discredited, because they want him out of the way. Otherwise he’s going to derail the gravy train and we’ll end up with healthy people again!

Do I need to remind you how bad things are? The USA in 2024 spent $5.3 trillion on health care, which works out to $15,474 per person, and is 18.0% of GDP.  Yet we are currently tabled at about 46th (males), 47th (females) in terms of overall health (the global health index). Indeed, various healthy life expectancy (HALE) analyses show the U.S. has declined sharply in global standing, with some research suggesting it has fallen into the 60s or lower for healthy life years compared with world peers.

In fact when it comes to “years lived with disability”, THERE ARE ONLY SIX COUNTRIES BEHIND US IN THE WORLD TABLE (204 countries).

Put another way, every dollar spent on the US Big Pharma healthcare system means more death and damage to the population. We are BUYING death and disability!

Go Bobby, go!

To your good health,

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

References:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, December 20). Rotavirus Vaccine Safety. CDC. 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Package Insert — RotaTeq (Rotavirus Vaccine, Live, Oral, Pentavalent). FDA. 

Vesikari, T., Matson, D. O., Dennehy, P., Van Damme, P., Santosham, M., Rodriguez, Z., … Heaton, P. M. (2006). Safety and efficacy of a pentavalent human–bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 354(1), 23–33. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Postmarketing monitoring of intussusception after RotaTeq vaccination—United States, February 1, 2006–February 15, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 

World Health Organization, Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety. (n.d.). Rotavirus vaccines and intussusception. WHO. 

Patel, N. C., Hertel, P. M., Estes, M. K., De la Morena, M., Petru, A. M., Noroski, L. M., … Chinen, J. (2010). Vaccine-acquired rotavirus in infants with severe combined immunodeficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362(4), 314–319. 

Mellone, N. G., & Carvalho, A. P. (2019). Kawasaki disease and the use of the rotavirus vaccine in children: A systematic review. Revista Paulista de Pediatria. 

https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/videos/us-falling-global-health-rankings

For decades, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has concealed the names of generic drugs made in foreign factories that failed safety or quality inspections. The agency’s secrecy has kept patients, doctors, and pharmacists from knowing whether the medications they rely on were manufactured in unsanitary or unsafe conditions.

At factories across India and China — which also supply the UK and other “Western” and European drug agencies, as well as much of America’s generic drug supply — FDA inspectors have found disturbing conditions: pigeons defecating on sterilized equipment, pathogens in purified water used for production, and stagnant urine pooling near areas where injectable drugs were made. Yet the inspection reports released to the public routinely black out the names of the drugs involved.

The FDA says the practice protects “confidential commercial information,” but patient-safety advocates say the secrecy undermines the agency’s mission. “Is there some quality issue? Is there a contaminant? I don’t know,” said Dr. Donna Kirchoff, a pediatrician in Oregon who has spent years trying to trace where her patients’ medications were made.

A Long Pattern of Secrecy

There is no law requiring the FDA to redact drug names, but agency lawyers claim to have adopted the policy decades ago, interpreting trade-secret rules broadly to avoid lawsuits from drugmakers. Current and former officials can’t recall who made the original decision or when. Huh?

As if drug makers would sue the FDA! What a joke. Even if they did, their statutory duty is the public as a whole. Nobody gave them a mandate to save money! (or if they did, it got lost long ago!)

The FDA declined to make its general counsel available for comment; former counsels contacted by ProPublica either declined or didn’t respond.

Industry groups have also stayed silent. The main generic-drug lobbying group said it had never weighed in, and the brand-name drug association, PhRMA, said only that while transparency can promote public health, the FDA must “protect sensitive manufacturing information.”

In what sense is filth and bad practice a “sensitive manufacturing” issue? It’s criminality getting under the radar!

Rat droppings are found as contaminants in a wide variety of buildings

An inspection report from 2022 illustrates the problem. FDA inspectors found spore-forming organisms contaminating sterile areas at a factory in western India. The plant continued shipping drugs to the United States, but with the drug names redacted, the public has no way to know which medications — or which patients — might have been affected.

This is true also in the UK and Europe, Australia and New Zealand too. But there is no equivalent to the FDA, which is SUPPOSEDLY there to protect the consumer, not Big Pharma.

Labels That Don’t Tell the Story

Even if the FDA released drug names, consumers would still struggle to connect the dots. Pill bottles rarely list the actual manufacturer or factory address. A single company may operate multiple plants, each with its own safety record. “If there are no specifics on the labels, pharmacists, patients, and their doctors can’t trace a drug back to the factory,” said former FDA official Dr. Janet Woodcock.

For years, the FDA resisted calls to require this disclosure. “What benefit would this give you and is it worth all the effort?” Woodcock said. “We didn’t think the juice was worth the squeeze.” So she didn’t think it was “worth the effort” to do her statutory job?

The agency has now reversed its stance, asking Congress to amend the law so that drug labels include manufacturer names, factory addresses, and ingredient sources. It also proposed listing more details online. Still, the FDA has not published a comprehensive list linking drug names to manufacturing sites, even though it maintains such data internally. Instead, it posts two separate lists — one with factory addresses but no drug names, and another with drug names but no factory addresses — that cannot be cross-referenced.

Last year, ProPublica sued the FDA for access to its full internal list of drugs and factories. The agency released some information but withheld more than 6,000 factory addresses, citing contractor confidentiality. The case remains ongoing.

Information the Public Not Allowed To See

The FDA also withholds other safety-critical information. Manufacturers must notify the agency within three days of discovering possible contamination or quality defects, but those reports aren’t publicly posted. The only way to see them is through a Freedom of Information Act request — a process that can take weeks or months.

In 2023, the FDA went further, stopping its practice of publishing reports that linked patient harm — including hospitalizations and deaths — to potential quality problems. “We’ve made it almost impossible for consumers to be their own best advocate,” said Lisa Salberg, founder of a nonprofit for people with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. “We want food labels to tell us what’s inside, but for medicine, we know nothing.”

A Case Study: Atorvastatin

Lipitor, a cholesterol-lowering statin, was one of the world’s best-selling drugs before Pfizer’s patent expired in 2011. Since then, more than 20 mostly foreign manufacturers have produced the generic version, atorvastatin. FDA records show about half those factories have failed inspections for safety or quality violations.

At one plant in central India, conditions were so poor that the FDA banned imports — then granted an exemption allowing the same factory to continue shipping atorvastatin to the United States. It doesn’t make ANY sense.

The millions of Americans taking generic Lipitor have no way to know where their pills were made or whether their supply came from that troubled plant. Manufacturing failures can be life-threatening: contamination with glass or metal, improper dissolution, or incorrect dosing. 

Pharmacies and insurance companies, not patients, decide which generic version to dispense. A refill could come from a pristine factory or one plagued by mold, rat poo and rust. 

The FDA says it is “reviewing the redaction process,” but offered no timeline. Some former officials defend the practice, claiming full disclosure could reveal proprietary manufacturing methods. Others disagree. “Inspection reports don’t include trade secrets,” said Woodcock. “They’re talking about whether the test was done correctly or whether there was mold in the dryer.”

Legal experts told ProPublica the blanket removal of drug names is improper and should be done case-by-case. But during their tenures, few FDA leaders questioned the practice. “If lawyers tell you you can’t do this or we’ll get sued, no one is going to take that risk,” said Dr. Mac Lumpkin, a former deputy commissioner.

Re-conditioned packaging for pharmaceutical products can easily be used then filled with substances that are NOT approved.

Twenty-Five Years of Lying and Resistance

Calls for reform stretch back decades. In the early 2000s, FDA officials proposed sharing unredacted inspection reports with Switzerland to coordinate oversight of high-risk foreign factories. Agency lawyers blocked it, saying even trusted foreign regulators couldn’t see confidential information. “They didn’t want to do anything that would make the industry mad,” said Lumpkin. “It was not, ‘What do we need to do for public health?’ It was, ‘How do we keep the FDA out of court?’” Or let’s not be cute, it’s: how do we keep our Big Pharma pay lords out of court?

Around the same time, Woodcock began building a database of factory addresses for all drugs approved in the U.S. “There was no information,” she said. “It was terrible.” Even after the database was complete, the FDA released only partial details — drug names without addresses, and vice versa.

In the 2010s, as the Obama administration emphasized government transparency, the FDA launched an online database of factory inspections — but continued redacting drug names from the reports.

In 2022, a committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine urged the FDA to require manufacturers to disclose where their drugs are made. So far, the agency hasn’t acted. All we can be sure of is that there IS a problem, otherwise they wouldn’t be keeping information secret.

A Promise of “Radical Transparency”?

When Dr. Marty Makary became FDA commissioner in 2024, he promised “radical transparency.” The agency soon began publishing more information on why it rejects applications for new drugs — but not on where existing drugs are made.

Two years later, the FDA still hasn’t released detailed data connecting generic drugs to their factories.

ProPublica, which paid for access to a commercial database of FDA inspection documents, continues to fight for disclosure through the courts. The case could determine whether Americans will finally be able to learn where — and under what conditions — the pills in their medicine cabinets are made.

Meantime, best advice? Don’t take drugs. There are safer ways to retore health. Drug manufacturers are not going to lower their profits, just to keep you safe! (no, really, I’m talking about pharmaceutical drugs, not contaminated methamphetamines and ketamine). The criminals are tracked down and go to jail. But Big Pharma executives never do; they just get richer and richer.

To your good health,
Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

SOURCE:

https://www.propublica.org/article/fda-hides-drug-names-contaminated-factories

Just don’t expect to read about it in the press or hear a TV segment that shares these remarkable discoveries. For the longest time now, “science” has  been conducted in the media. You have journalists “commenting” on things they don’t even understand but they do know their job: they have been told to trash contrary voices and take down personalities with dissenting views.

This is blared across headlines and the public assumes that there is a science debate going on. NO THERE ISN’T. It’s just character assassination. And there are always creepy individuals to step up to the plate and lie or dissemble. One wonders are they getting paid? Or just vicious nasty human beings who seek the chance to pour evil on good!

Take an article which ran recently in the doctors’ daily blog MedPage Today (Sept 30^th): it was a takedown of actress and activist Jenny McCarthy. She’s a shining light in social media with millions of followers and what I consider quite balanced and sensible views. 

But she was labelled an “antivaxxer”. That’s always a good start if you want to destroy someone’s credibility. In fact it’s a lie. In her own words she considers herself in favor of “safe vaccination” (well, who isn’t?)

But she dared to get in on the Tylenol (acetaminophen) debate and therefore she must be destroyed.

My readers will probably remember I was there long before the current wave, with reservations about Tylenol and its possible role in autism. Nearly 10 years ago I drew attention to the fact that Cuba had a very high rate of vaccination (over 99%) and yet almost NO autism, coming in at around 0.00168% of the population!¹

Surely this is a screaming siren calling attention to the fact that all current theories are probably wrong? Well, this is another “I told ‘em” but now everyone seems onto the story. And good job it is so.

Note: What is highly significant is that, here in the USA doctors routinely advise acetaminophen/paracetamol as a prophylactic for the fever that commonly accompanies vaccination, even up to five days beforehand! In fact some kids get their first autistic symptoms before vaccination!

In Cuba, the drug metamizole is most commonly prescribed for fever and NOT acetaminophen/paracetamol.

“While some of McCarthy’s claims are rooted in truth,” the critical piece said, “An expert told MedPage Today that McCarthy mischaracterized the relationship between acetaminophen and glutathione and manipulated information to fit an agenda.” 

Oh, just exactly like normal scientists then! As for “expert”, I would say dimwit. But we’ll come to that in a moment.

Glutathione is, of course, our number #1 detox molecule. Without it, we’d be dead in hours.²

“But what if your body is low in glutathione?” Jenny McCarthy posited. “What if that detox methylation system gets kind of jolted, broken, if you will, lowers so that it cannot detox the adjuvants, the aluminum in the body? Then it winds up floating around the body, attaching to brain, gut — you name it.” 

McCarthy recommended not taking Tylenol before or after vaccines and to get glutathione levels checked. Here’s where the blog trotted out a phoney as an “expert”

“I personally have never ordered a glutathione level or checked it in my entire life as a toxicologist,” Lauren Shawn, MD, an emergency medicine physician and medical toxicologist at Phelps Hospital in Sleepy Hollow, New York, told MedPage Today. “Glutathione level itself is not really clinically relevant to me in my practice.”

She’s a toxicologist and glutathione is not relevant to her practice? It’s like saying she’s cardiologist but doesn’t need a stethescope and can’t read an EKG!

As for vaccines, Shawn said that the recommendation to not take acetaminophen or other anti-inflammatories before a shot is to avoid blunting the immune response and has nothing to do with glutathione or fears of toxicity. Lying again: the 99% reason doctors prescribe acetaminophen is to control the fever which almost invariably results from a shot.

And goes on with breathtaking ignorance, to say, “Taking acetaminophen afterwards to manage symptoms is absolutely fine.”

She clearly has not read the latest science that shows acetaminophen to be a very toxic substance which no one should take, ever.

Toxicity from acute or chronic overuse of acetaminophen is an actual concern, and N-acetylcysteine, which helps the body make glutathione, is the antidote. NAC is a precursor of glutathione.³

In an online video, McCarthy shared that she and her son, who has autism, both have naturally low glutathione levels, even though she didn’t take acetaminophen before or after vaccines, and they both get weekly glutathione IV infusions.

The Dimwit Continues

Shawn said glutathione is one of the hot new treatments in alternative medicine, even though evidence doesn’t support the therapy. This is a criminally negative doctor talking. There are TONS of papers on the clinical importance of glutathione in medicine and health.

“Best-case scenario you’re giving yourself expensive urine,” she added. Ah, the old “expensive urine therapy” ploy. Well, statins give you VERY expensive urine, for no real benefit. Same with anti-depressants.

Shawn also said anti-vaxxers like McCarthy and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “use the big medical terms and words, and they sort of touch on things that are kind of correct,” but don’t have the expertise to analyze and understand the data.

So… if someone says something that’s accurate and true, you can discredit them by saying they don’t have the expertise to analyze and understand the data. Well, how expert do you have to be to understand that Tylenol is repeatedly associated (lots of studies!!) with psychological damage and social withdrawal. Loss of positive empathy, they call it… kind of like autism?⁴

“I just think it’s so dangerous that these celebrities and non-healthcare professionals are saying things as the truth without real evidence or understanding of what they’re saying, and they’re convincing other people to follow their lead,” Shawn said.

She’s lying, of course, because there is lots of evidence for what McCarthy is saying. Yes. She’s not medically trained. But any intelligent person can understand the issues, if you just read the science (which Shawn clearly has not done!)

The article for MedPage Today was written by under-performing journalist Rachael Robertson.

One of the comments below her article was by an RN: 

Why do we even have to listen to those WITHOUT ANY MEDICAL BACKGROUND? They have their own agenda and don’t listen to anything they don’t agree with. Seems like anyone who wants some publicity can start spouting their views. Is there any common sense left?

We have this expression in England (from centuries past): The pot calling the kettle black. Get it?

To your good health,

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

Main Source:

https://www.medpagetoday.com/popmedicine/cultureclinic/117722

Citations:

1. https://alternative-doctor.com/cause-of-add-acetaminophen-during-pregnancy/
2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4684116/
3. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/110853?utm_source=chatgpt.com
4. Front. Psychol., 29 March 2019. Sec. Perception Science, Volume 10 – 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00538

— Government independence, transparency, and legal integrity must be restored…

Blare the Medpage Today headlines (October 4^th). Say what? The government health agencies never had the least shred of trust, there was never independence, transparency or integrity.

Read instead: lying, cover ups, bribes, pay outs, obfuscation and secrecy—and abiding by the law never seemed to trouble those ensconced in the FDA, the CDC, NIH or ACIP.

Trump and RFK jr. have called out the mob in control of medical protocols and profits (same thing) and they don’t like it! They are screaming (and sweating).

“The combined MMRV offers a simple, safe way to protect children from four potentially serious diseases with one injection,” claimed the above article. That’s a complete, bald and politically-motivated lie. Combining the jabs is very dangerous and makes a bad situation worse. I have stated repeatedly that I was probably the first doctor in the world to spot the sudden wave of severe autistic disorder, following within days of the MMR shot. I spoke about it on radio and it’s in my 1985 book (written 1984) The Food Allergy Plan.

Next they claim missing the chicken pox vaccine “opens the door to resurgent chickenpox and later shingles — an often painful, debilitating, and sometimes deadly disease.” So how come that chicken pox in otherwise healthy children is described by the FDA as “usually a self-limited disease of mild to moderate severity.” That’s not deadly. Nobody ever died of typical chickenpox.

Similarly, shingles was once an unpleasant disease but uncommon, mild and self-limiting UNTIL THE ADVENT OF VACCINATIONS, since when it has become widespread and quite debilitating. There is no question among those of integrity and knowledge that the current wave of shingles was caused by the totally unnecessary mass vaccination campaign against chickenpox.

A great book to read on this topic would be Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit and Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines by Gavin de Becker. De Becker is a security and protection billionaire, who protects Robert F. Kennedy jr. on his campaigns. It’s a brilliant book and I wolfed it down even though, as you know, I have a great deal of insight into this issue. I read things he’d uncovered which I could barely believe.

It costs just $5 and is worth every penny. Download it as a Kindle book here.

Gavin de Becker. He advizes the great and mighty (Jeff Bezos, Richard Burton, Dolly Parton, Jane Fonda and Tina Turner, for example) on personal security and safety. 

De Becker is very witty, which I enjoy. He asks rhetorically how would we feel if every one of the top manufacturers has been criminally fined for the worst sorts of offences? “Let’s find out how we’d feel…” he says and then treats us to a long list of intolerable criminality [edited down by me]:

Pfizer: For illegal marketing of its products, the company was forced to pay the largest criminal fine in US history. Plus $1 billion more in a 2009 settlement to resolve violations of the False Claims Act… another $240 million in criminal fines, and another $190 million in 2004 to resolve false claims made to Medicare and Medicaid. That’s all—other than $60 million the same year for kickbacks and off-label marketing, and $ 40 million in settlements with whistleblowers, $75 million for fraudulent marketing, another $15 million for paying kickbacks to healthcare providers. 

Johnson & Johnson: $5 billion to multiple states and local governments for its role in the opioid crisis, deceptive marketing, downplaying the risks and overstating the benefits of their products, false claims made to mislead doctors, patients, and regulators, tricky promotion to get doctors to prescribe their products more widely, producing and distributing products they knew to be dangerous, producing and distributing Fentanyl products, and failing to adequately warn about the risks of their products. 

Earlier in the book, de Becker covered the billions J & J paid ($4.7 billion so far) in connection with baby powder that they knew for decades had cancer-causing ingredients that harmed people, another $2.2 billion for illegal marketing and kickbacks to doctors and pharmacies, $5 billion in 2013 for selling a product they knew was dangerously defective, another $1.1 billion in penalties for failing to warn about the risk of heart attack and strokes from one of their products, $33 million for their false and misleading marketing that overstated benefits and downplayed risks of Depo-Provera, $70 million for bribing doctors and pharmacies to prescribe drugs that were not appropriate for the conditions being treated. 

GlaxoSmithKline: $3 billion in penalties for fraud and failure to report safety data. Glaxo apologized and moved on. 

In 2014 found guilty of systematically bribing doctors, hospitals and government officials to boost drug sales, through a network of 700 middlemen and payments estimated at $150 million. GSK initially called the allegations a “smear campaign,” but eventually they admitted the illegal activities. Glaxo apologized and moved on.

I did not know that in 2014, the European CDC reported that Glaxo released gallons of live polio virus solution into a water-treatment plant in Belgium.

Merck: We all know about the criminal Vioxx scam, $650 million criminal fine for paying kickbacks and overbilling Medicare. Two of Merck’s virologists became whistleblowers and revealed that the company had tested their MMR vaccine, against a cherry-picked variant of the mumps virus rather than against the actual virus children might encounter. 

And guess what: The MMR tests came out really good—until it was revealed Merck had added rabbit blood to human samples in order to boost antibody levels. 

“Hey, nobody’s perfect,” says de Becker!

And guess what? Vioxx is now back on the market. That’s proof the FDA is criminally in cahoots with Big Pharma. If you are a man aged 65 to 74 you have a 1 in 50 chance of a heart attack this year. If you are taking substantial doses of Vioxx, that shifts to a 1 in 10 chance!

Eli Lilly: a criminal fine of $515 million in 2009, a civil settlement that could reach $800 million, for a total of $1.4 billion, all resulting from their product Zyprexa. They had to pay $1.2 billion to settle about 32,000 cases with customers who were injured by the same product, plus $47 million paid to a bunch of states for improper marketing. 

“I could share similarly rosy accounts regarding Sanofi, Novartis, and Roche,” says de Becker sarcastically, “But all we’d see is more price gouging, failure to disclose side effects, bribery, corruption, defective products, delayed recalls, lies, misuse of political influence, and cheating on clinical trials.

So the question which hangs is: DO YOU TRUST THESE CORPORATIONS TO BE TRUTHFUL WHEN THEY SAY IT’S COMPLETELY SAFE TO INJECT THEIR VACCINES INTO OUR KIDS? I hope not, otherwise you need psychiatric help!

And the second question hanging is: why do these fines not rein in the company’s bad behavior? The answer is that these fines are just chump change for them. They earn $trillions and get fined $million or a few $billions. They probably have it factored into their business plans! An allowance for criminal fines, XX%.

Seriously though, it’s a problem. Lying and cheating is endemic in US business practices (Oh plenty of others, China for example). But here we are talking about lying that costs lives—very many lives—not just greed or avarice.

We have to pray that RFK stays alive long enough (with de Becker’s protection) to dismantle the whole rotten empire, put Big Pharma on the back foot and clear out the nest of vipers, once and for all. Otherwise children everywhere are going to be destroyed and children are our future. THE future. The ONLY future.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy jr. has pledged to find the true cause of autism.

At the time of writing, the HHS tally of autistic and brain damaged male kids is  1 in 20 (California 1 in 12.5)* Meantime the grotesque corporations go on pouring on medicines which contain aluminum, mercury, asbestos (baby powder) and lead (milk formulas). Injecting kids with vaccines that don’t even apply to them (COVID, which no child or infant ever got) or Hep B on their first day in earth (Hep B is exclusive to drug addicts, prostitutes and homosexuals) and have shown themselves to be clearly capable of manipulating safety and effectiveness data in favor of profit and AGAINST the interests of children affected.

This has to be stopped. Pray to God it is. 

To your health,

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Alternative Doctor

* https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/autism-epidemic-runs-rampant-new-data-shows-grants.html

The posey (and dangerous) belief that US doctors are the best trained in the world is a myth. As an outsider myself, I have never seen so much incompetent blundering on any scale, as here. I’d far rather go to India to have my appendix out or have a gallstone removed than do it in this country.

So MANY people die here of medical incompetence. It doesn’t show up nearly enough, because the patient is listed as dying of the disease, instead of killed by the doctor. It’s right to ask: are American doctors among the most incompetent in the world?

There is good reason to think so. First, July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, wrote an article “Is US health really the best in the world?”

Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans a year.  106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals.  Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: that’s 2.25 million deaths.  You might want to read that last number again.

Incredibly, 106,000 deaths per annum were caused by the CORRECT medicine, CORRECTLY prescribed, according to BEST PRACTICE!¹

Here is another citation: Author, Jeanne Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.'”  

The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”²

The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse events.”

Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans.

By the last count, independent studies suggest that between 200,000 and 400,000 people die each year in the United States from preventable medical mistakes. That doesn’t even count the millions maimed and injured.

And lately, a significant article published in the BMJ has shown convincingly that 1 in 250 patients die here when treated by US-trained doctors.

Medicare patients admitted to the hospital and treated by internists who graduated from medical schools outside the United States had lower 30-day mortality than matched patients cared for by graduates of US schools, according to results of a study published online in the British Medical Journal (BMJ).³

But that’s just the background. How about indescribably stupid blunders that literally kill people? There was a case in court recently in which a doctor was being sued, because he had removed a man’s liver BY MISTAKE. It’s mind boggling that a professionally qualified and trained surgeon could remove a liver by mistake. He thought it was the spleen, which is what he was supposed to remove.

Trouble is, though you can live for years without your spleen, you can’t live more than a few days without a liver. The patient died. 

I’m reminded of an old doctor’s gag: “the operation was a great success but the patient died.”

Wrong Side

Removing a limb or organ from the wrong side of the body is not rare—but inexcusable.

An Air Force veteran went for treatment for possible cancer of one testicle. When Benjamin Houghton went into surgery to remove his diseased left testicle at West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, the surgeons mistakenly removed the right, healthy testicle instead. 

The medical mistake was traced back to the patient’s medical record where the surgeon failed to mark the correct side before undertaking the operation. Mr. Houghton and his wife brought a medical malpractice case against the VA Medical Center for $200,000.

In 2007 neurosurgeons at Rhode Island Hospital made not one, but three catastrophic medical mistakes by performing wrong site surgeries on three different patients’ heads. 

Two of the mistakes were caught early enough to close the initial holes and treat the correct side, but the other surgery killed an 86-year-old patient. Believe it or not the surgeon who made these mistakes had his medical license suspended for only two months. So much for doctors policing themselves.⁴

Only a few days ago, I was reading about a baby who was decapitated at birth, because of extremely rough handling (read: ridiculously excessive force). The baby had become jammed, making it a very difficult delivery (or impossible for a clod of an ObGyn). Why didn’t he elect for an emergency caesarian? As a result of the delay the baby died but to rip its head off, taking delivery? Makes you shudder.

In February 2024, the Clayton County Medical Examiner’s Office ruled the baby’s death a homicide caused by “actions of another person,” stating the  death resulted from a fracture of cervical vertebrae in the spine.

The parent’s attorney, Dr. Roderick Edmond expressed the gravity of the situation, stating, ” Every aspect of the evidence that shows what happened is traumatizing, something I’ve never seen in my life.”⁵

The poor family were, of course, very upset. But they were even more traumatized when some pathologist MD posted pictures of their child’ autopsy on social media, without the parent’s consent, showing the decapitated corpse… I mean? 

His excuse?  A clause in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) that allows physicians to inform the public when there are safety concerns in health care. His justification cannot be supported.

Just a Mistake?

You might find yourself being sympathetic. No matter how terrible a blunder, it could have just been a mistake, surely?

Well, how about this case: a surgeon deliberately took a screwdriver and stitched it into a patient’s spine!

Surgeon Robert Ricketson was to operate on a patient’s spine but couldn’t find the titanium rods he intended to use. So instead of canceling the procedure, he sawed off a screwdriver handle and put that to use instead.

No surprise: within a few days the screwdriver makeshift rod broke, resulting in agony for the patient. 

Robert Ricketson, sued for his actions, said he had no choice but to implant the screwdriver into the back of Arturo Iturralde, then 73. He said he did not have the titanium rods needed to complete the operation properly. A nurse who was present knew full well this was criminal doctoring and retrieved the screwdriver parts and sent them to a lawyer, so the truth quicky came to light.

It emerged this grossly incompetent surgeon had already had his medical license suspended in Oklahoma and revoked in Texas, following a string of malpractice lawsuits and treatment for a narcotics addiction. He had also admitted to writing fake prescriptions to obtain drugs.

In 2017, a 49-year-old man was injured in a motor vehicle accident. The surgeon failed to conduct standard tests (like an angiogram), neglecting to check for arterial blockages. This led to inadequate blood flow post-op and the  negligence ultimately required an above-the-knee amputation.

In 2024 a jury awarded $10.2 million in damages.⁶

In 1995 patient Willie King was subjected to a wrong-limb amputation. He was scheduled to have his right foot removed, instead his left leg was taken away. The surgeon was Dr. Rolando Sanchez. During the surgery, Dr. Sanchez realized too late that he was operating on the wrong leg but the operation had already progressed past the point of reversal. In this case it was even more tragic because Dr. Sanchez believed he was removing the correct limb, the left leg had been fully prepped ready, before he even entered the OR.⁷

All this violates to first principle of medicine, which is FIRST DO NO HARM.

Finally, A Great Tragedy

In June 1997 singer Julie Andrews underwent an operation on her vocal cords at New York City’s Mount Sinai Hospital. As we all know, the surgical procedure left her unable to sing. Her beautiful, crystal clear 4-octave voice was ruined and even her speaking voice turned harsh and rasping.

In December 1999, Andrews filed a lawsuit against her doctors and Mount Sinai. It claimed she had not been told of the risks of the surgery and that the results “ruined her ability to sing and precluded her from practicing her profession as a musical performer.” There had been “no reason to perform surgery of any kind.” A statement from Andrews also noted, “Singing has been a cherished gift, and my inability to sing has been a devastating blow.”⁸

A confidential settlement was reached the next year. But no amount of money could replace that voice.

It only remains to say that the majority of doctors are not so incompetent. And to reiterate my earnest advice to all: IF YOU WANT TO STAY HEALTHY AND LIVE LONG, KEEP AWAY FROM DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS!

OK, a quirky one this week from me. But while others go banging on about the health benefits of herb teas and “reasons to take vitamin D, part seventeen”, I sometimes cast a wider net, as you all know!

To your health,

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

References:

1. Starfield, B.(2000, July 26). Is US health really the best in the world?JAMA, 284(4), 483–485. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.4.483
2. BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989
3. BMJ 2017;356:j273
4. https://leightonlaw.com/12-famous-medical-malpractice-cases/
5. https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/father-speaks-out-after-babys-decapitation-death-in-clayton-county-ruled-homicide
6. https://www.wsorlaw.com/chicago-personal-injury-lawyers/10-2-million-verdict-for-illinois-negligent-amputation
7. https://blog.thinkreliability.com/blame-solves-nothing-revisiting-the-willie-king-wrong-site-amputation
8. https://www.biography.com/actors/julie-andrews-vocal-cord-surgery-lost-voice

This is pretty shocking. I was proud to be a British doctor; the standards for qualification are far higher than in the USA. We were a socially-funded health service, the envy of the world. But that was then; this is now…

The dream has soured. For years I’ve been writing about the evils of a nationalized medical system, where drugs and equipment were totally in private hands. In effect, it means that the taxpayer is funding—at VAST profit—the pharmaceutical industry. And they have no choice: nobody ever actually ASKED the average Brit if they minded paying obscene prices to, effectively, a Nazi derivative business.

Josef Mengele, the infamous doctor of Auschwitz, is now the watchword for evil experiments on captive human beings. 

Josef Mengele, often dubbed the “Angel of Death”.

He’s dead but his work continues apace. We had the infamous Tuskegee syphilis experiment (“Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male”), a clinical study conducted between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama, by the U.S. Public Health Service.

In a 1946 to 1948 study in Guatemala, U.S. researchers caused prison inmates, insane asylum patients, and Guatemalan soldiers to be infected with syphilis. Approximately 700 people were infected as part of the study (including orphan children). The study was sponsored by the Public Health Service, the NIH (National Institutes of Health), the Pan American Health Sanitary Bureau (now the World Health Organization’s Pan American Health Organization) and the Guatemalan government. Read that again: the NIH and the WHO directly sanctioned this abuse!¹

There are many other examples of abusing unwilling or uninformed humans beings as guinea pigs in idiotic testing schemes, including infections with deadly or debilitating diseases, human radiation experiments, injections of toxic and radioactive chemicals, surgical experiments, interrogation and torture experiments, tests which involve mind-altering substances, and a wide variety of other experiments. Many of these tests were performed on children, the sick, and mentally disabled individuals, often under the guise of “medical treatment”.

Latterly, of course, we have had the global experiment of subjecting BILLIONS of uninformed and gullible individuals, many unwilling but forced, to a toxic experiment in DNA manipulation… and it has gone horribly wrong. The true cost of COVID vaccines is only slowly emerging, because the truth is even now being suppressed forcefully by the “authorities” (read perpetrators).

Most of the evil greed, the lies, the coercion, has emanated from the USA, true. But other bodies around the world have not been slow to march in lock-step with the Nazi forces in our midst.

The General Medical Council (GMC, Read Conspiracy)

I come now to the story which caused me to take up my angry pen (some say I write best when I’m ranting, in which case this is gonna be good, because I’m INCANDESCENT…)

A very dear friend, Dr. Sarah Myhill, is being dragged through every horrible evil process of law you can imagine. Her “crime”? She’s a loving, caring and very wise doctor, who thinks like me and that the whole COVID enterprise sucks AND SAYS SO. She suggested that natural remedies are best. She advocates for diet, exercise, stress management, nutritional supplements, detoxification, herbals and homeopathic medicines. 

But that is not considered good medicine. So much so that things already came to a head in the 1990s when she was chastised because her prescribing budget was so low. In establishment eyes that made her a bad doctor. She did not soak up the Big Pharma B*S*

As a result of her anti-COVID stance, what we call the General Medical Council of Great Britain (the GMC) has persecuted her mercilessly. She is now (officially) the most persecuted doctor in British history. No fewer than 43 attempts were lined up to destroy her. She survived the first 39 attempts: Sarah 39, GMC nil!

Here’s a picture of Dr. Myhill I took last year, standing proudly in her organic garden.

A famous British advocate (what we call “King’s Council) was so incensed he offered to defend her for FREE! (you won’t get lawyers doing that very often but that’s a measure of how patently unjust this whole “process” was).

But the GMC has unlimited resources. They were bound to win in the end, simply because they could go on forever in their petty-minded vendetta. The GMC emerged as no more than a bunch of criminal lackeys, long past their sell-by date, who only retain their powerful roles because they work for Big Pharma. They do NOT represent the patient’s safety, as they claim, but seek to forward corporate interests at every turn.

Consider the evil of what they did. First off, THEIR lawyer, Peter Mant KC, advized her to lie (in court) to escape suspension from the practice of medicine. The GMC’s own lawyer advized dishonesty! Yet the GMC’s own ‘Good Medical Practice Guidelines’ state that doctors must be honest. They must be honest to patients. This is a legal imperative. 

Second, they wouldn’t allow her subpoenas for witnesses in her favor and cancelled them. The witnesses who turned up anyway were barred (effectively denying her a defense).

They would not even consider her written evidence: she supplied the GMC with a plethora of documents, clearly demonstrating the efficacy of various holistic treatment regimes: 35 pages of details, all fully referenced. But they refused to read it.

They refused her permission to cross-examine their chief witness (obviously because he was an ignorant toady who just quoted the party line but could not possibly stand up to questions about the anti-viral effects of vitamin D).

Science was not discussed, indeed it was not allowed.

For instance their stooge said the doses Sarah was advocating were “potentially lethal.” 10,000 IU of vitamin D “potentially lethal”? It’s absurd. It would have been great to hear him cross-examined and asked: “Where did you get such data?” Of course there isn’t any. 10,000 IU is about as much as we make in our bodies in 30 minutes on a sunny day!

So much for “expert” testimony.

The craziness of all this is that THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SINGLE PATIENT COMPLAINT AGAINST HER IN DECADES. Their own lawyer, Tom Kark KC commented: ‘The problem with the Myhill cases is that all the patients are better and none will give witness statements.’  The man on the street would describe this as a witch hunt. And alas, my friend being a woman, one can only quake at what would have happened to her in centuries past…

Notwithstanding, the GMC, acting on phoney complaints of Big Pharma lackeys, arraigned her on criminal charges. She was “struck off” the register in February 2023. In UK terminology that is the same as losing her license.

The truth is decent, honest and competent people cannot stand up to the phoney stooges that Big Pharma has put up against them. It all comes down to the dollar. Simple effective remedies threaten their profits. That cannot be allowed to stand.

So the Mengele circus swings into action; patients will die; good doctors will be silenced and lost. It’s like progress in reverse but all (heavily) disguised as “science.”

THEY DON’T CARE. Mengele didn’t care.

Even so, it is shocking to learn what industrial scale control Big Pharma has over government bodies and institutions. We saw it in the USA, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Europe and the rest of the world. They do it with money, of course. The GMC is as bought-and-paid-for as the FDA, CDC, NIH, etc.

As well as being bankrolled by the subscriptions of doctors, the GMC is also financed by the Department of Health, AstraZeneca, Merck (as well as McDonald’s, PepsiCo, Coca Cola etc.) The GMC has become a tool of Big Government and Big Pharma.

Sadly, Sarah is not the only victim of this intellectual Nazism. Jean Monro, one of the greatest, was taken down. There are too many good doctors neutralized to list.

But Sarah is unrepentant and is still in there, fighting. David and Goliath becomes Sarah and the Juggernaut! She took her case to the High Court and lost, not because she did not present good evidence, but because the judge cherry-picked those parts that suited the inevitable outcome. She’s going to the Supreme Court and will surely lose again and for the same reason.

But she has to do that to be allowed access to the European Court of Human Rights (it is necessary for a plaintiff to have exhausted all due process in their own country).

Good luck Gurl. Knock their puny testicles off! Not that I supposed they have actually got any!

To your good health,

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

The FDA is busy meddling in the affairs of holistic health practitioners, trying to stop as much as possible of the grass roots indulgence in natural and traditional recipes that we all love. They cite “lack of scientific proof” as their objection. But you just wait till you see what I am going to reveal…

At the same time as attacking natural cures, they are not doing their real job; we all know that too. They toady up to Big Pharma and give them what they want, re-interpreting the rules and going easy on the proper demands and requirements.

But surely, in the end, a drug has to prove it has some value before being “approved”? Even if they covered up the side-effects and negative, there must be something concrete required?

Well, let me tell you that in the 9 years from 2013 to 2022 the FDA approved 429 drugs, most of which were authorized on the basis of wholly inadequate evidence that they worked as claimed. This is according to a database of government records set up to analyze this criminal defect in our protection!

In fact, according to Jeanne Lenzer and Shannon Brownlee, writing for The Lever, over those years:

• Seventy-three percent of drugs approved by the FDA did not meet the agency’s four foundational standards required to show they work as expected. 

• More than half of drug approvals were based on preliminary data rather than sound evidence that patients had fewer symptoms, improved function, or lived longer. 

• Fifty-five of the 429 drugs approved met only one of the four standards needed to show that a drug is safe and effective; 39 drugs met none of them.

Drug companies have been allowed to market hundreds of prescription drugs to doctors and sell them to unsuspecting patients despite glaringly inadequate evidence that they offer any benefit and in many cases amid clear signs that they pose a risk of serious, often irreparable harm.

These are just some of the findings of a two-year investigation by The Lever and the McGraw Center for Business Journalism into all 429 new drugs approved from 2013 through 2022. A team of four experts, three of whom are physicians and one a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard, evaluated the scientific studies cited by the agency in its approval decisions.¹

So what are these four basic standards of proof that the FDA supposedly demands? They are simple enough:

• Control group: Patients taking the drug were compared to a control group that was given a placebo or a comparator drug.

• Replication: At least two “well-controlled” trials showed the drug was effective.

• Blinding: Subjects in the studies and the doctors who cared for them don’t know which patients are on the drug and which are in the control group.

• Clinical endpoint: The studies measured the drug’s effect on patients’ survival or function rather than a surrogate measure.

Seems reasonable, just basic science. Yet these were not being upheld. Only 2.4% of the 123 cancer drugs approved from 2013 through 2022 met all four of the FDA’s basic scientific criteria. 2.4%! A shocking 29 drugs (23%) met none of these criteria!

Eighty-one percent of cancer drugs were approved based on preliminary evidence rather than data showing patients would live longer. Studies of cancer drugs approved on preliminary evidence have failed to show they improve survival in the vast majority of cases.

Surrogate Evidence

So what is surrogate evidence, referred to in the requirement for a clinical endpoint? It means showing you did something that is arguably useful but not actually proving the drug has any value to the patient ie. of no proven clinical value.

A good example is a vaccine, where manufacturers simply show that they produced a rise in antibodies against the pathogen. That’s a “surrogate” result. We really want to show that it stops people coming down with the disease!

But that’s not what happened with Gardasil. IT HAS NEVER BEEN SHOWN TO PREVENT YOUNG GIRLS GETTING CERVICAL CANCER. But among all the lies, cheating, corruption and meddling with statistics of which Merck was guilty, they did (just) manage to show it increased antibodies against the human papilloma virus (HPV).²

Another example of a surrogate result is with cancer drugs. Shrinkage of the tumor has become the gold standard of a drug deemed effective. But that really has no benefit in terms of quality of life, comfort and the most prized result of all: longer survival!

[Indeed, as I teach, half the tumor is your own immune cells in there fighting the cancer. Reducing the tumor by knocking off the T-cells would be a disaster, yet looks attractive as a surrogate result]

Negative Outcomes (Side-Effects)

If you are crafty like Big Pharma you can often try to blind the reviewers with surrogate outcomes and distract attention away from a lot of negative or even fatal side-effects being caused.

Be certain, drug manufacturers know all about side-effects, even deaths, produced by their products. Merck was well aware of the huge number of deaths being caused by their NSAID Vioxx. They hid the problem (oh yes, they did, and all has now been exposed), in order to protect their sales.

The penalty for killing in excess of 50,000 people? None. Nobody was indicted for a crime. The company was fined $321 million. That’s just chump change. A fine of $10 billion would barely hurt them or their profits.

Deferred Science

The biggest subterfuge of all was that the FDA adopted the position of “we’ll approve your drug for the time being but you need to come up with some science to prove it works, PDQ.” (PDQ British slang from the Raj days: pretty damned quick!) 

The resulting seismic shift from proving drugs work before they are approved to showing they work only after approval — if ever — has been quietly accomplished with virtually no awareness by doctors or the public.

On occasion, a pharmaceutical company did come up with retrospective science that showed their product had value. But most of the time, as you would expect, they simply failed to do so. And, also as you would expect, the FDA was pretty sluggish at withdrawing its approval even when the drug was shown to be worthless.

According to a 2022 analysis by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, more than one-third of drugs approved on an accelerated pathway have never seen a confirmatory trial. When they did conduct the studies, regulators found companies took anywhere from a few months to 12 years to do so. This investigation found that confirmatory trials can take even longer — up to 30 years — and may not be performed at all. Even if they were, it was often not a clinical trial but more surrogate preliminaries!

This also, incidentally, makes a joke out of the defense by drug companies that they need to charge inordinate prices, to cover the costs of research. B*S*! They just slide a product past the all-too-compliant FDA and they can pay for “research”, such as it was, out of the profit from the bogus approved product!

Avastin was approved in 2008 for use against metastatic breast cancer. By 2010 sales had risen to $6.8 billion. But it was useless. One of the conditions imposed by the FDA was that the manufacturer, Genetech, conducted a study to prove the drug worked. A full two years later, Genetech finally came up with two studies which actually suggested the opposite: the drug did not help patients live longer.

In total, the company had conducted five clinical trials, none of which demonstrated that Avastin helped breast cancer patients live longer or with less disability. The new studies also documented the drug’s more serious side effects, which included blood clots, perforated intestines, stroke, heart problems, and kidney malfunction.

Eventually the FDA did withdraw its approval but against massive opposition from Genetech and various cancer advocacy groups (all funded by Big Pharma, of course).

One more example and I’m done: Copiktra, a cancer drug manufactured by Secura Bio Inc. was approved in 2018 for use in cases of leukemia and lymphoma. But it took 11 months off the average survival of patients. That’s bad.

But it was 6 years later before the FDA spoke out against it and announced that Copitra should not be used as first- or second-line treatment for certain types of leukemia and lymphoma “due to an increased risk of treatment-related mortality.”  I think that means it was killing people.

How many patients had their lives shortened in those 6 years, because of an “FDA approved” drug? 

What Is Success?

Even when cancer drugs do improve survival, the gains can be meager. A 2022 study by researchers at the National Cancer Institute found that the median [increased] survival time for 124 cancer medicines approved from 2003 through 2021 to treat solid tumors was just 2.8 months. The average cost of such drugs is more than $24,000 per month. 

In other words, after patients and their families spend financially crippling sums and go through side effects ranging from nausea to death, their outcomes are hardly better — and could be worse — than no treatment at all.

We’ve all known that Big Pharma and the FDA are engaged in an elaborate dance of deception, which doesn’t just put people at risk: IT KILLS. But just remember what I’ve written when you hear screams and cries that RFK jr. is destroying medicine and “people will die” as a result of what he’s doing!

We’ve got a minimum of 4 years to clean up the evil and he’s off to a good start in my view!

To your health,Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Alternative Doctor

References:

1. Main Source: https://www.levernews.com/fda-approved-and-ineffective/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
2. HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activism, Infectious Agents and Cancer, Lucija Tomljenovic, Judy Wilyman, Eva Vanamee, Toni Bark, Christopher A. Shaw; doi:10.1186/1750-9378-8-6

Trouble is, they grew rather impatient with the concept of deceased. People were being prepped for removal of essential organs, when the patient started showing signs of still being alive; of waking up even! This rather inconvenient occurrence led to organ transfer companies (yes, there are such entities) insisting that life support was removed anyway—in other words killing a reviving patient, so as to get on with the job.

They don’t want anyone to be alive, to recover. No joy or delight at life’s immeasurable resilience and determination. THEY JUST WANT THE MONEY. The profits. Obscene profits…

And you know what? A lot of these killing factories masquerade under the banner of “non-profit”. It’s a joke and I’m astonished that the federal government doesn’t look seriously into these scams (for so they are).

Here’s yet another example of attempted murder, in this week’s medical news…

A federal investigation found a Kentucky nonprofit pushed hospital workers toward surgery despite signs of revival in patients.

Four years ago, an unconscious Kentucky man—Anthony Thomas Hoover II—began to awaken as he was about to be removed from life support so his organs could be donated. Even though the man cried, pulled his legs to his chest and shook his head, officials representing Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates still tried to move forward.

They wanted him dead!

Anthony Thomas Hoover II by his sister Donna Rhorer

Now, a federal investigation has found that officials at Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates, a “nonprofit” in charge of coordinating organ donations in Kentucky, ignored signs of growing alertness not only in this case but also with dozens of other potential donors.

The investigation examined about 350 cases in Kentucky over the past four years in which plans to remove organs were ultimately canceled. It found that in 73 instances, officials should have considered stopping sooner because the patients had high or improving levels of consciousness, but they tried to bulldoze it through’ tried to get the patients killed, so they could reap their profits. What actual contempt for human life.

Mercifully, the surgeries didn’t actually happen, but multiple patients showed signs of pain or distress while being readied for the procedure. Yet the organizers refused to quit. Instead they put hospital staff under intolerable pressure to generate real death, so they could get on with their grizzly “harvesting” procedure! 

Some staff workers started muttering that this was euthanasia.

The federal investigation criticized Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates, which was coordinating donations in the state. Now called Network for Hope after a merger, it has said it always follows the rules and never removes organs until a hospital has declared a patient dead.

But this was clearly just a bald-faced lie. In fact the organization’s employees repeatedly pressured families to authorize donation, improperly took over cases from doctors and tried to push hospital staff to remove life support and allow for surgery, even if there were indications of growing awareness in patients.

At times it was not properly recognized by staff that hospital sedatives or illegal drugs could mask patients’ neurological condition, meaning they might be in better shape than they seemed. That didn’t deter the predators.

In December 2022, a 50-year-old overdose victim began stirring less than an hour after being taken off life support and started looking around. Yet the organ retrieval attempt was not immediately ended, nor was the patient given any explanation.

“The patient had no idea what was going on but was becoming more aware by the minute,” hospital records noted.

After 40 more minutes — when the patient’s organs would no longer qualify for donation — the attempt was called off, and he was moved to an intensive care unit. He later sat up and spoke with his family before dying three days later, the investigation found. Those extra three days are not to be dismissed; they were of great importance to the family, and the victim.

Overall, the official investigation flagged 103 cases as having “concerning features” and found problems were more likely to occur at rural hospitals. It noted more than half of transplants arranged by the Kentucky organization were from circulatory-death patients, above the national average.

Nationwide, officials recovered about 20,000 organs from this type of donor last year, nearly double the total in 2021, according to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, which oversees the transplant system.

Federal regulators told the network last week that the Kentucky organization must increase training for staff and conduct neurological assessments on potential organ donors every 12 hours, among other changes.

On Thursday, Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates said it had received a report about the government investigation. “We will fully comply with all of their suggested recommendations,” it said in a statement.

The federal inquiry began last fall after a congressional committee heard testimony about the Kentucky man, Anthony Thomas Hoover II, who had an overdose in 2021. He was unresponsive for two days before his family agreed to donate his organs.

Over the next two days, the procurement organization moved toward surgery even as the patient’s neurological condition improved, the investigation found. During one exam, records show, he was “thrashing on the bed.” 

How did they deal with that inconvenient fact? The patient was sedated to prevent further motion!

The hospital staff “was extremely uncomfortable with the amount of reflexes patient is exhibiting,” case notes read. “Hospital staff kept stating that this was euthanasia.” A procurement organization coordinator assured them it was not. But of course he was just lying. It was a very deliberate attempt at euthanasia, to get at the money!

The hospital doctor refused to withdraw life support. Mr. Hoover eventually recovered. Now 36, he has lingering neurological injuries. Network for Hope did not respond to a request for comment on that case.

Smirking Andi Johnson, vice president of marketing and community engagement, Network for Hope

We know from interviews with The New York Times, two former employees of the procurement organization said higher-ups tried to pressure the doctor concerned to continue the retrieval attempt. “If it had not been for that physician, we absolutely 1,000 percent would have moved forward,” said one of them, Natasha Miller, who was in the room. Three other former Kentucky employees said they had seen similar cases.

The Kentucky attorney general’s office also launched an investigation into Mr. Hoover’s case. On Thursday, the office said the review was ongoing. Heads will roll? I doubt it. Call me cynical but I have no faith in the compassion of the US medical “industry.”

Just bear stories like this in mind if you are ever faced with the dilemma of a loved one in a coma and whether to take them off life support and donate their organs. Forget the story you are “Helping someone else to live.” They have their own health karma. You are furthering the cause of exploiting life for financial gain.

Meanwhile, your loved one might wake up and ask what’s going on!

Final Note: Vivien wants me to tell you to be careful when handling official declarations. Take change-of-address forms, for example: they often have a box to tick at the bottom, “Do you want to be an organ donor.” Think twice before ticking it!

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Alternative Doctor

Principal Source:

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/06/us/kentucky-organ-donations.html

Does that sound like old medieval Church dogma? Yes, it does. Thing is, about religious zealots, they have assumed the power—from God knows where—to destroy those who are in conflict with their scriptures. Think of the torture, burnings and executions of old. Women were burned alive; they were especially dangerous for some reason (or was it the sexual depravity of certain men, who enjoyed the screams?) At least men were usually decently strangled to death before being burned. Phew!

The gentle Cathars were wiped out in the 13th century by a holy “crusade”, which murdered men, women and children who were ostensibly Christian, because they would not conform to Papal dogma. So they were swept off the face of the earth. The final cruel act was to enclose 200 of those left and burn the entire stockade and turn every human within it to ash (Montsegur, France, 1244).¹

[https://www.ariegepyrenees.com/en/patrimoine-culturel/chateau-de-montsegur/]

But you have to ask: what mighty mandate from on high gave them the powers to torture and kill? What were they afraid of? If God exists, as they fervently believed, how could His role be endangered by a few trouble-makers and non-conformists? Isn’t this really just some kind of psychological disease that will probably never appear in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (the DSM), because true believers of that faith are protected by the Church? They are “with God.” 

The psychiatry “bible”. Strangely, not one of the 300 mental conditions listed has a definitive laboratory test. It’s all opinion and beliefs!

Today the equivalent medical “scriptures” would be the torrent of pseudo-scientific drivel that floods our journals in support of Big Pharma and its obscene profits. True believers feel themselves virtuous, safe and utterly right, to quote this stuff, against all evidence to the contrary. But that’s not enough for them. They just HAVE to seek and destroy those who are not of the true faith. And they are backed and supported, of course, by governments, the CDC, FDA and bodies around the world such as the British Medical Council, which seek to destroy all doctors who do not practice the proper sacraments! (drug and vaccination protocols)

Well, I’m being sarcastic, of course. But am I also right? If so, we have a deal of trouble to come. They want our kids, they want our bodies, our rights can be removed, because the scriptures demand our compete surrender to “what is right” and if we don’t comply, we are as nothing. This is Nazism on the march again.

And guess what? It has given them the right to lie to us, to be tricky and obscure the truth and their sources, so that we may not question what our betters tell us. Imagine a medieval monk standing up to the abbot and saying, “This is crap. What you are telling us doesn’t make sense.” He would instantly be removed from the presence of others, in order that he did not “contaminate” the true believers in the community. Likely strangled as well, I think!

RFK, of course, becomes 666, “the mark of the beast.” They are already in a ravening frenzy to have him destroyed. He’s not only closing the temples of faith, he is tearing up the holy scriptures and deriding them as worthless—or even worse—as WRONG!

The scary part is that the vast majority of doctors fall in with this nonsense. They don’t even question the “teachings”; they know the science is all in and inviolate. They know all the parables (examples of how their theory is right and examples of how the unbelievers are destroying society and blighting the  children, who have to be protected). 

Such sanctimonious blatherings. Don’t let mere facts get in the way. It’s absolutely religion all over again.

Safe and Effective (A Hymn!)

This is the most sacred chant of all; do you know it? I think we all know the words!

To the tune: Scientifically proven. “No serious after-effects; completely effective; any problems are caused by the unvaccinated; if it doesn’t work give even more doses; if someone gets sick, the vaccine “didn’t take”; God save us from the anti-vaxxers…” and so on!” Haha!

In the words of super-investigator Jon Rappoport:

“When you stop and think about it, official science is, in a significant sense, a holy church.  Therefore, it is no surprise that the church’s spokespeople would wield power over major information outlets.

“These prelates invent, guard, and dispense “what is known.”  That was precisely the role of the Roman Church in times past.  And those professionals within the modern Church of Science are severely punished when they leave the fold and accuse their former masters of lies and crimes.  They are blackballed, discredited, and stripped of their licenses.  At the very least.  

“Totalitarian science lets you know you’re living in a totalitarian society.”

[https://jonrappoport.substack.com]

What Are We To Do?

We (the rebels, the corrupt, the non-believers, the lost souls) are a community of our own. We stand defiant, as did the brave people of the past. I’m not talking martyrs, we don’t need that. But just individuals willing to claim—not “We have The Truth”… that’s what the faithful clamor—but we have the right to make up our own minds about our own salvation. That right comes from Above and it not to be usurped by sleazy politicians, corrupted scientists, media creeps and evil pharmaceutical maniacs.

But if we don’t fight for it, we’ll lose it.

Because of the wording of corrupt or perverted science, I’m always reminded of the closing words of Winston Churchill’s famous “Finest Hour” speech to the British people (1941):

“Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be freed and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.”

We are getting very close to that abyss.

How sad that the wokes want to deface and tear down Churchill’s statue in Parliament Square. They call him a racist. But the only reason the crazies are free to do their mindless thing is because of the defiance of great men and women, who stood up for freedom when courage was needed. Without Churchill’s leadership, the Nazis may have won and the parents of the wokes would likely have ended up as soap or lampshades made of human skin and there would have been no wokes to complain!

© CEphoto, Uwe Aranas

]]> https://alternative-doctor.com/send-in-the-shills/ Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:57:23 +0000 https://alternative-doctor.com/?p=23458 Don’t Bother, They’re Here!

[echoing the lyric of Stephen Sondheim’s “Send in The Clowns”]

There’s a lot of stuff coming out to make the medical profession squirm. So what do they do? Go into denial! Hire of few shills to pick apart the science and pretend it’s no good, while their “science” is impeccable. Aw, c’mon!

First Off:
CT scans cause cancer. A LOT of cancer. It reminds me of the old days of mass chest x-rays in the 1950s and 60s, looking for TB and lung cancer. It emerged that the mass x-ray program was CAUSING more cancers than it was finding. So the program was abandoned. But that was then; we don’t abandon lucrative programs these days, just because we are killing patients, Oh no!

Watch what happens. I bet you NOTHING happens. Or some shill will crawl out of the woodwork, to play around with the figures and prove it was all nonsense.

Truth is, according to a paper published in JAMA, CT scans could be causing up to 100,000 cancers a year, in the USA alone! That would be about 5% of cancers  per year CAUSED by this diagnostic method.

True it was not a population study as such but a “risk assessment”. That doesn’t make it invalid. These forecasts have to be taken seriously and the approach to medicine reviewed. We don’t NEED that many CT scans and that’s a fact.

A risk model suggested that radiation from CT exams in 2023 were projected to lead to over 100,000 future cancers over the lifetime of the patients exposed that year.

Previous projections published in 2009 had estimated that approximately 29,000 future cancers would result from routine CT exposures.

These projections, and the frightening new 2023 figures, were reported by Rebecca Smith-Bindman, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, and her colleagues. 

Risks were higher in children and adolescents, but higher CT utilization in adults accounted for most (91%) radiation-induced cancers.

See, CT scans use ionizing radiation (like x-rays). MRI scans and ultra-sound are much safer and don’t use radiation. But it’s going to be a tough sell, getting doctors to go back to using their skills and training, instead of just sending the patient off for a CT scan.

Worse still is that patients can be very demanding and insist on the CT scan. They believe that is the “best” available and won’t be fobbed off with something else.

Try explaining the concept of “low-value testing” to a distraught Mom!

And—you guessed it—the shills speak up on behalf of the very lucrative CT scan “industry”. They dismiss these projections as a “theoretical risk” and insist that modeling studies “are not based on actual patient outcomes.” Which of course mean they are defending their turf and are not going to budge.

“There are no published studies directly linking CT scans (even multiple CT scans) to cancer,” the American College of Radiology (ACR) claimed in response. “Americans should not forgo necessary, life-saving medical imaging and continue to discuss the benefits and risks of these exams with their healthcare providers.”

Smith-Bindman and colleagues acknowledged that the study had several limitations, including the fact that their risk estimated model parameters were based on Japanese survivor outcomes “…and questions remain about the transfer of radiation risks from the mid-20th century Japanese population to the current U.S. population.”¹

Oh well, that’s it then. It’s only the Japanese. We can’t apply those figures to US human beings (please don’t write me, I’m being sarcastic, not a racist pig!)

Flu Vaccine Seems to INCREASE Disease!

Whoops, what a HUGE embarrassment. We’ve known for decades, of course, that the flu vaccine is useless. They never get the strains right for the year and, in any case, over 95% of flu cases don’t have flu (fact), they have an influenza-like illness ILI (not caused by one of the flu viruses). 

So, to show that it’s not only not working but INCREASES your chances of an ILI is doubly humiliating. It shows up not only the shoddy science behind the flu vaccines but makes a fool out of all the doctors who support the nonsense and keep spouting that everyone must have a flu shot!

Call in the shills! Quick!

One of the first to rally to the cry was Jeremy Faust, editor-in-chief of MedPage Today, an emergency medicine physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and a public health researcher.

“Of course, people who are anti-vax, love to jump all over this,” he says. “It’s a stunning Cleveland Clinic… negative effectiveness study. What’s stunning about it is how bad it is. So if you don’t know that, you shouldn’t be in this space. Go back to writing fiction.”²

Arrogant little bastard.

But Faust fails to make his point convincingly. He waffles about susceptible depletion bias, bad science and the study authors who “aught to know better” but in the end, the unvaccinated group had a lower incidence of flu. Period.

In any case, even if specious tweaking of figures managed to bring the vaccinated group back on top, it means the two groups are very close. They shouldn’t be. According accepted wisdom there should be lots of cases in the unvaxxed group and NONE in the vaxxed group!

And of course this overlooks the actual patients harmed by the vaccine. Oh yes, there are none, I remember now… Vaccines are 100% safe! (now I’m being really sarcastic, get it?)

Now Comes The Worst Of It:

This one is too difficult to waffle and blur the pitch. This one will have to be retracted and it won’t be long before that happens, I predict; a matter of weeks I should say. Pfizer will bring immense pressure to bear to force the journal to “retract” the paper, so they can pretend it never happened.

But the secret is out. In a press conference on March 11, 2025, Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP, dropped a bombshell: all analyzed Pfizer and Moderna vaccine batches contain dangerously high levels of DNA, potentially transforming recipients into “genetically modified organisms.”

“In every single vial tested, there is an extremely high amount of DNA… stable compared to mRNA, can integrate into human DNA,” Kotlár asserted. “Theoretically, DNA fragments can integrate into the host genome, increasing the risk of genetic mutations.” Remember this guy is an MD, as well as a politician.³

Not just any old fragments of DNA but that from the SV40 virus. This finding raises urgent safety concerns, particularly due to the well-documented role of SV40 as a potential carcinogen.

This discovery not only highlights serious lapses in regulatory oversight for mRNA vaccines but also revives disturbing parallels to the polio vaccine scandal of the 1960s, where millions were unknowingly exposed to SV40. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) formerly hosted a page acknowledging this connection, but they have now taken it down. Tara! It never happened!  It was just “misinformation” ahead of its time.

So authorities carry on blithely, as if nothing is wrong. They are STILL recommending old folks and the vulnerable get their COVID shots! No care or caution on view, anywhere…

Doesn’t it make you sick the way they protect their Pharma buddies and are quite prepared to kill or risk killing humans in the process?

The connection cannot be shrugged off because of the huge surge in cancers we are seeing, particularly very aggressive and rapidly-fatal cancers, which have been nicknamed “turbo-cancers”.

Instead of exercizing caution and putting a hold on these vaccines, official sites are quick to criticize detractors. BUT THEIR ARGUMENTS ARE NONSENSE.

The Australian TGA (equivalent of the FDA) waded in with the arguments that the samples are small (3 phials only in one of the labs). But just one phial is enough to establish contamination. Some samples were past their expiry date (so what? DNA is either present or not). Some may not have been stored “correctly” (so what? even kept at room temperature they would not articifically “grow” DNA!)

Finally, they try and discredit these labs by saying they are not properly authenticated for testing vaccines. They were not “testing vaccines”, they were looking for contaminants. Even college kids could do that, given the necessary equipment.⁴

These are the guys who whine about those who spread “misinformation”? The public should trust the science, they say? I don’t think so, not this kind of “science”.

This page was on CDC.gov, now deleted. But you can read the cached (archived) version here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/historical-concerns/index.html

You’ll find this para:

Simian Virus 40 (SV40): 1955 – 1963

“Because of research done with SV40 in animal models, there has been some concern that the virus could cause cancer in humans. However, most studies looking at the relationship between SV40 and cancers are reassuring, finding no causal association between receipt of SV40-contaminated polio vaccine and development of cancer.”

The key word there is “most”. It’s a sin that ANY SV40 virus particles should be in a polio vaccine! The argument “It’s OK, it doesn’t cause cancer,” is irrelevant. It’s also NOT TRUE. There is a known oncogenic (tumor causing) mechanism connected with the SV40 virus, which is that it suppresses the p53 gene, which is protective against cancer. As an example, SV40 definitely causes cancer in hamsters.⁵

Moreover, pleural mesotheliomas and osteosarcomas develop in hamsters injected intracardially with SV40.6

Is that important? Yes. We use hamsters in lab testing because their immune systems reespond quite like ours! So claims that it doesn’t apply to humans is disingenuous at best, outright lying more likely.

I’m really angry, as you can see. This is supposed to be the great calling of medicine. Yet these crooks are playing with human lives, just to protect their profits.

Look after yourself—and I mean that advisedly,

To your good health,

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

References:

1. 1. Smith-Bindman R, et al “Projected lifetime cancer risks from current computed tomography imaging” JAMA Intern Med 2025; DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0505.
   2. https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/faustfiles/115110
   3. https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-news-slovak-government-official
   4. https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/addressing-misinformation-about-excessive-dna-mrna-vaccines.
   5. M Carbone, R Stach, I Di Resta, H I Pass, P Rizzo. Simian virus 40 oncogenesis in hamsters. Dev Biol Stand. 1998 ;94:273-9. PMID: 
   6. Cicala, C., Pompetti, F., & Carbone, M. (1993). SV40 induces mesotheliomas in hamsters. The American Journal of Pathology, 142(5), 1524–1533. PMID: 8388174; PMCID: PMC1886912.