Trying to knock the value of vitamin and mineral supplements.
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote carefully to you all, explain the distortions of studies which ignored the “sick user” effect. It seems like more people are dying of a therapy, whereas in fact they are taking the therapy because they already have a problem.
This latest study (Oct 10th 2011) ignored it royally and came to a disastrous conclusion. You might think they INTENDED to make vitamin and mineral substances look bad!
At the very least, it’s a childish conclusion.
In women aged 55 to 69 years, several widely used dietary vitamin and mineral supplements, especially supplemental iron, may be associated with increased risk for death, according to data from the Iowa Women’s Health Study, published in October 10 2011 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Not all “vitamins” were bad, but several, it is claimed, were: notably multivitamins, vitamins B6, and folic acid, as well as minerals iron, magnesium, zinc, and copper.
Self-reported use of dietary supplements increased substantially between 1986 and 2004. In addition, supplement users had a higher educational level, were more physically active, and were more likely to use estrogen replacement therapy.
A total of 15,594 deaths were reported up to December 31, 2008, representing about 40% of the initial participants. The use of multivitamins overall was associated with 2.4% increased absolute risk for death, it said.
Vitamin B6, folic acid, iron, magnesium, and zinc were associated with about a 3% to 6% increased risk for death, whereas copper was associated with an 18.0% increased risk for total mortality when compared with corresponding nonuse.
In contrast, use of calcium was inversely related to risk for death (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 – 0.94; absolute risk reduction, 3.8%).
“Although we cannot rule out benefits of supplements, such as improved quality of life, our study raises a concern regarding their long-term safety,” the authors add.
In a related editorial, it was claimed that the current study adds “to the growing evidence demonstrating that certain antioxidant supplements, such as vitamin E, vitamin A, and beta-carotene, can be harmful.”
In fact there is no such evidence: just the constantly raked over fiasco of the 2007 JAMA study. It purported to find that antioxidants were not only ineffective but were actually dangerous and caused increased deaths. The press were on it straight away, of course, hooting that supplements were likely to kill you.
What was fatally flawed about this study was that the researchers, for some unknown reason in defiance of logic, excluded all studies where no deaths took place. What? It’s a way of saying “we’ll exclude every study that showed supplements and antioxidants were quite safe”.
Do you smell a rat? I do.
In any case, this silly current study is way out of step with tens of thousands of papers pointing to the many health and longevity benefits of supplementation. These too are never referred to. It’s as if they conveniently didn’t exist.
ONE WORD OF CAUTION: Iron is definitely dangerous to some people. Those with iron overload syndrome, a common but rarely diagnosed condition, face rapid death due to fulminating bacterial infections. Their immune system is powered down by iron (genes for iron overload affect about 40% of the population).
This study was partially supported by the National Cancer Institute and the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, and the Fulbright program’s Research Grant for a Junior Scholar. One study author is an unpaid member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the California Walnut Commission. The other authors and editorialists have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1625-1634.
Keith,
At 81 years and going for 130 I have taken all of the above and more for the past 35 years with a father and his father(both deceased in dementia by age 74 I have broken that mold. Of course high doses of copper can be a health hazard and certainly a major contributor today to Prostate cancer through knocking out the zinc which prevents the testosterone changing to dehydrotestosterone after age 40. And as you will be aware all prostate cancer cells are completely devoid of zinc and citrate.
Otherwise these studies are contrived bully-poop.
Keith if you mail me separately I will introduce you to a world first Transdermal body spray that I am about to market.
donya Keith keep at the barstewards!
I would like to add a few words on folic acid vs. folate. Folate is the natural B vitamin, as found in foliage: leafy greens, beans, other veggies, etc. There is research showing the body doesn’t do so well on the artificial form, folic acid, and that it contributes to cancer and other serious diseases. Yet most people aren’t aware of this, or of the difference. After all, folic acid is the one mandated to be added to flour and baked goods. Instead of this, we should all be getting all the folate we need from food or, if we need a supplement, it should be made with folate, not folic acid. For a good article on the subject, check out http://www.drfuhrman.com.
Was a bit worried after reading Dr Fuhrman’s article. For every such view, there is an equal and opposite view. Please read this article by Mr. Andrew W. Saul : Folic Acid Does NOT Cause Cancer at http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v06n17.shtml
What can be done to remove feritin? I have high serum ferritin. The options I have seena re to give blood or take IP6. I don’t weith ienought to donate blood and I haven’t seen much of a decrease form IP6.
Can’t really answer, you don’t even say if you are male/female or of menstruating age… etc.
Sorry about the spelling mistakes on my last e-mail. I am a 55 year-old, non-menstruating female. It may be coincidental but the problem seemed to start over a year ago when I took some iron pills to deal with anemia. The iron just seemed to get stored. I stopped taking the iron when my serum ferritin jumped up to 343. The lowest I’ve been able to get the serum ferritin down to is around 240 and serum iron to 158.
How does serum iron differ form serum ferritin?