GROUNDHOG DAY TODAY!
I had a very disturbing experience this week… Seems to set a trend for the future, I fear.
I was called by one of my subscribers to act as an expert witness in a court case. I had to testify via camera and microphone online, from my home in Las Vegas to a courtroom in California, which was quite an experience in itself. The issue was whether a responsible parent should rightly be cautious about vaccinations, or even hold back. Or whether that was an irresponsible thing to do?
The guy who hired me was convinced that the judge would be open to learning the real story. After eliminating a couple of mothers of damaged children (because they would be “biased”), his witnesses were reduced to myself, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny MD and Lawrence Palevsky MD, a board certified US pediatrician, to present the data showing that vaccinations were definitely NOT “safe and effective” as the propaganda would have us believe.
I think you would all have been proud of the torrent of pure science on display. No opinions or quotes, just fact after fact after fact, from scientifically credible peer-reviewed journals. Doctors who have a scientific background and understand the issues fully, parading the problems, LOTS of problems, with the official story about vaccines.
Larry Palevsky went first and was very impressive. He comprehensively tackled the question of aluminium (which the Americans insist of calling aluminum) in vaccines. It’s there as an “adjuvant” which means to make things work better. But it is also a notorious nervous system toxin. There is no argument on those grounds. So what is it doing in vaccines given to little kids?
Good question. Because there are NO safety tests of any kind regarding aluminium in vaccines. Also present is polysorbate 80. Polysorbate 80 has been found to negatively affect the immune system and cause severe anaphylactic shock, which as you know, can kill. According to Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology1, “it is of current relevance as a ‘hidden’ inductor of anaphylactoid reactions”, and “Polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent for the anaphylactoid reaction of nonimmunologic origin in the patient.
But it’s worse: there have been studies in Food and Chemical Toxicology which showed that Polysorbate 80 causes infertility. Baby female rats were injected with polysorbate 80 at days 4-7 after birth. It accelerated the maturing of the rats and caused changes to the vagina and womb lining, hormonal changes, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles.
This is one of the known facts that fuels the not-so-crazy belief that mass vaccination is being used as a form of forced sterilization and population control.
Larry was cross-examined and when asked why he featured only negative science and did not mention any positive scientific studies showing that vaccination was effective, replied “There aren’t any!”
He also pointed out that the product insert (the little information sheet included with the packaging of medicines and vaccines) warns us that there are serious dangers! For example, autism and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) are listed as ‘adverse events reported during post-approval use’ of the dTAP vaccine (pertussis and tetanus). According to the OFFICIAL warning: ‘Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting.’
This is not just the rantings of whackos, for heaven’s sake: this is the official packaging (which pro-vaxxers never read, obviously).
Dr Sherri Tenpenny spoke particularly to the supposed effectiveness of vaccines. She paraded the official CDC definition which is that “effectiveness” meant it caused a measurable antibody response. But that’s not the same as saying it protects people; in fact it’s a million miles from that. The artificially provoked antibody response was almost worthless and faded in a very short space of time, which is why you’ve got the picture of large number of people who have been vaccinated catching the disease.
For example the 2016 mumps outbreak among Harvard students took place ONLY among vaccinated students2 (not surprising, since Merck falsified their mumps results by introducing animal antibodies into the “final” tested serum, to make it look like it really worked (fraud). But they were never forced to withdraw it by the FDA/CDC).
They would try to dress this up this sort of failure as some sort of freak outbreak or the good old chestnut: the vaccines “didn’t take”, whatever take means. But in fact such outbreaks of disease among vaccinated individuals is far from rare. Yet they think nothing today of forcing troubled parents to go through the anguish of vaccinating their children, knowing the dangers, and yet all completely pointless, because most vaccines do not confer any real protection.
Dr. Sherri quoted some science form the CDC itself (straight from the horse’s mouth) that antibody levels do not correlate with protection status. Again, THIS IS THE OFFICIAL ADMISSION: vaccines create a short-term shower of antibodies but there is no proof these antibodies protect you at all. They admit it!
I wanted to lay out the table, logically, and focus on different aspects of the problem:
- Are they effective? Not really. This is fudged.
- Are they safe? Absolutely not. There is abundant evidence from the international arena (suppressed or ignored by US business interests) that certain vaccines are not safe.
- There are contaminants NONE of which should be present.
- The schedule is oppressive and driven by profits, not medical science.
- Conflict of interest is rampant.
- Despite the propaganda, the US approach is a disaster. We are 34thin the world table of child health, behind Norway, Belgium, Spain and Ireland.
After doing a general run through of the weak suppositions on which vaccination “science” is based, I decided to go first for the issue of purity and hygiene in vaccines. It’s a pretty dirty story!
And did you know, for instance, that human baby foreskins (after circumcision) are used to make vaccines? Is that horrific or not?
In a study, published Feb 2017, in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers led by Antoinetta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, say their results “show the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the products’ ingredients lists.3
According to the researchers: worrying particles were identified that are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration.
For example, the Italian team found lead particles in the cervical cancer vaccines, Gardasil and Cevarix, and in the seasonal flu vaccine Aggripal manufactured by Novartis as well as in the Meningetec vaccine meant to protect against meningitis C.
Samples of an infant vaccine called Infarix Hexa (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and haemophilus influenzae type B) manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline was found to contain stainless steel, tungsten and a gold-zinc aggregate.
Other metal contaminants included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium. Chromium (alone or in alloy with iron and nickel) was identified in 25 of the human vaccines from Italy and France (but mainly US manufactured) that were tested.
GSK’s Fluarix vaccine for children 3 years and older contained eleven metals and aggregates of metals. Similar aggregates to those identified in the vaccines have been shown to be prevalent in cases of leukemia, the researchers noted. We don’t know what that means.
But the worst part is the aluminium story: we know aluminium is not biodegradable. It persists in the body and is carried across the blood-brain barrier, where it also accumulates. Now, thanks to the work of Professor Christopher Exley at Keele University (UK), we know that large amounts of this biotoxin are found in the brains of autistic children. In fact his words were “never seen such shockingly high levels in any human tissue”.
One autistic boy of 25 years was found have aluminium levels ten times those which would be acceptable for an adult, never mid a child.4
That doesn’t prove aluminium causes autism of course. But it does PROVE that doctors are poisoning our children with a serious nerve toxin that cannot be removed easily from the body.
ADDED TO WHICH, Exley also found incredibly high levels of aluminium in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients. So it is not unreasonable to call the judge’s attention to the fact that, since the frenzied rise of mass vaccination from the 1950s onwards, we have seen an epidemic rise in the levels of autistic and nerve-damaged kids and a shocking epidemic-scale surge of Alzheimer’s cases, over the same period.
BTW, in case you are wondering, safety tests on aluminium were only ever done on ingested (swallowed) aluminium. No safety tests have ever been done on injectable forms of aluminium, such as a vaccine.
You can listen to Prof. Exley talking here (sorry about the Chinese dancing ad!):
Conflict of Interest
It’s laughable. The CDC, which is supposed to be a watchdog body, is actually paying everyone’s salaries by SELLING vaccines. The CDC is in fact the world’s biggest retailer of vaccines, turning over $billions. How can we trust statements by the CDC?
And it may surprise you to know the prestigious medical schools are really bad in this respect.
Harvard’s own faculty members had this to say about conflicts of interest: 1600 of 8900 professors and lecturers admitted that “they or a family member have ties to drug companies that could bias their teaching or research,” including 130 with financial ties to Merck and 149 with financial ties to Pfizer. That’s nearly 20 percent of Harvard’s teaching staff are potentially untrustworthy on this key issue.
A former leader of Harvard’s immunology lab also held a position, at the same time, on the corporate board of directors at Bristol-Myers Squibb, a pharmaceutical company. They gave her a $270,000 paycheck while she was in charge of immunology at Harvard.5
For conflict of interest you can read bribery and corruption. It’s the same thing.
The judge’s final pronouncement? Myself and Dr. Palevsky and Tenpenny were “fringe”; a polite word for loonies, I think. He dismissed all our evidence and barred the respondent from being involved in health decisions for his children. The evil persistence of this vaccination war against truth is very depressing.
SOURCES:
Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Volume 95, Number 6, December 2005 , pp. 593-599(7) (2018).
How Did Vaccinated Harvard Students Get The Mumps?. (2018). HuffPost.
MediaCrave.pdf (2018). Medcraveonline.com.
Exley, P., Post, H., Bowen, M., Brennan-Ing, D., & Potet, J. (2018). Aluminium and autism – The Hippocratic Post. The Hippocratic Post.
Harvard Medical School in Ethics Quandary – NYTimes.com. (2018). Nytimes.com.