Before measles vaccine was ever invented, the deaths due to measles had dropped from all-time highs of 100,000s per year to 100 per year. Some of this we know had a lot to do with better hygiene, sanitation, electricity, transportation of food, refrigeration, labor laws, and nutrition.
But I think a major often-overlooked reason is the correction of vitamin A deficiency in the population, so let’s look at that first.
You will know that I personally choose vit A as the “antibiotic vitamin”, not D as some try to maintain. In the 40s and 50s kids in the Western world were widely dosed with cod-liver oil, which contains lots of vitamins A and D.
That helped… a LOT! (the D also cleared up rickets!)
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) defines Vitamin A as the name of a group of fat-soluble retinoids, primarily retinol and retinyl esters. This vitamin is involved in immune function, supports cell growth, and plays a critical role in the normal functioning of the heart, eyes, lungs, and other organs.
Add to that the fact that vitamin A is a far better protective against the ill effects of measles than any vaccine ever was (vitamin A is the recommended treatment for acute measles, even on the CDC website, did you know?) and you’ll realize this enhancement of vitamin A status was crucial.
[The CDC website has recently carefully manicured its recommendations: it now says: “Consistent with guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics, vitamin A may be administered to infants and children in the United States with measles under the supervision of a healthcare provider as part of supportive management. Children with severe measles, such as those who are hospitalized, should be managed with vitamin A!] That’s as near as they get to suggesting supplements are a good thing!
The CDC suggests doses as follows:
If vitamin A is recommended, it should be administered immediately upon diagnosis and repeated the next day for a total of 2 doses under the supervision of a healthcare provider. The recommended age-specific daily doses are:
• 50,000 IU for infants younger than 6 months of age
• 100,000 IU for infants 6–11 months of age
• 200,000 IU for children 12 months of age and older
These are very substantial doses. I have never taken more than 50,000 IU as an adult!
Be aware that you can have too much vitamin A, as well as too little. Hypervitaminosis A, as it’s called, can cause symptoms like nausea, dizziness, blurred vision, and long-term issues like liver damage and bone problems. The Tolerable Upper Intake Level for adults is 3,000 mcg RAE per day. RAE = retinol activity equivalent. That comes out at 10,000 IU daily max.
In pregnant women, high doses of vitamin A have been linked to severe birth defects.
So set the obvious and powerful benefits of correcting widespread vitamin A deficiency among kids against the claims for vaccination and you will see obvious hysteria on show. They now claim that measles deaths dropped by over 99% following the introduction of the vaccine in 1968. [Oxford University]
That’s just sheer massaging of facts (lying). In the United States the mortality rate for measles decreased by more than 98% before the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1963 (Figure 1).
In England, we see the same thing—a dramatic decrease in deaths before the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1968 (Figure 2). The percent decline from peak was 99.6% down at the time that the measles vaccine was introduced. Measles deaths were gone!
And that’s a fact: in some New England states, in 1963, when the measles vaccine was introduced, there no deaths at all from measles.
The same can be said incidentally for other infectious diseases such as whooping cough—massive declines in death before the introduction of any vaccine. Scarlet fever, which was during the 1800s a bigger killer than whooping cough or measles, went to near zero without the use of a vaccine.
[https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2015/07/31/measles-the-new-red-scare/]
The Hysteria and Fear Game
But the criminal shills for the pharma industry never stop, for shame. I just came across the fact that Stanford University researchers modeled what could happen over a quarter-century if Americans no longer took vaccines: 290,000 measles deaths (they claimed); 23,000 cases of polio paralysis (they claimed); 41,000 babies born with congenital rubella syndrome (they claimed); and possibly more than a million deaths from diphtheria (they claimed).
What a scam! As I said, by the time that measles vaccine was introduced there were VERY FEW deaths anywhere. All that can be honestly predicted is that it would go back to the status quo, ie. not a problem. For example there were only 5 measles deaths in all of New England before vaccines. Washington state had a measles death rate of 0.3 per 100,000.
The Pharma Scammers Have Scant Regard For Mere Truth
There was no possibility of using the truth to spin their webs. So they make up lies or, as they call it, modelling
First notice the word “modeled”. They did a made up scenario and then pretended it was fact. Actually, what they did was took a range of their own guesswork figures, averaged them, and then supposed that would give a fair, unbiased estimate of what would happen. [They call this “science”]
Their second sly trick was to suppose matters would go back to how they were in Victorian times: poverty, open sewers, widespread malnutrition and so forth. That’s just not true. By the time vaccinations came along, the death had all-but vanished (actually was ZERO in several states by that time). So logic decrees that we would just go back to that era. Except…
Third, and the most hidden and nasty, is that they fail to mention the terrain has now been altered to an unsustainable degree by vaccination itself (see below).
Here’s Where It Gets Really Worrying:
A controversial study done on chickens shows that vaccinated birds caused the viruses to mutate to a more deadly form. Of course some scientists say it has little relevance for human vaccination! Well haha! Chickens are very relevant when it suits them. How often have you seen “bird flu” traipsed through the media as a deadly threat to humans?
But when it threatens their status, they deny it works that way round.
Evolutionary science suggests that many pathogens aren’t deadly, or not even very virulent, because if they kill their host too quickly they can’t spread to other victims. Now enter vaccination. Some vaccines don’t prevent infection, but they do reduce how sick patients become. By keeping their hosts alive, such “imperfect” or “leaky” vaccines could give deadlier pathogens an edge, allowing them to spread when they would normally burn out quickly.
Now a 2015 study proves it can happen with Marek’s disease, a viral infection in chickens. Over the past few decades, Marek’s disease has become much more virulent—which some researchers believe is the result of vaccination.
When the birds weren’t vaccinated, infection with highly virulent strains killed them so fast that they shed very little virus—orders of magnitude less than when they were infected with less virulent strains. But in vaccinated birds, the opposite was true: Those infected with the most virulent strains shed more virus than birds infected with the least virulent strain.
Thus, “vaccination enabled the onward transmission of viruses otherwise too lethal to transmit, putting unvaccinated individuals at great risk of severe disease and death,” the authors wrote in PLOS Biology. It made matters worse!
[https://www.science.org/content/article/could-some-vaccines-make-diseases-more-deadly]
What if this should happen to the new Ebola vaccine? That’s a sensible question asked by study author Andrew Read, a biologist at Pennsylvania State University, University Park. To which industry-fan Adrian Hill, a vaccine researcher at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, retorts “He [Read] should stop scaremongering.” The whole distinction between leaky and nonleaky vaccines is flawed… Every vaccine is leaky, in that some people don’t get protected by it, some people are partially protected, some people have prevention of disease, and others prevention of infection.” Millions of people around the world receive shots every month, and there is no evidence that that has ever led to any disease becoming deadlier, Hill says.
But Hill is disingenuous at best, possibly a pharma shill. We now have new and nasty microbes CAUSED BY VACCINATION. The official term is vaccine-derived viruses (and bacteria). We now have “wild” measles (an atypical form) caused by the vaccines; an altered polio viruses pool; immunity-adapted hep B; antigen loss strains of pertussis (which thus escape the vaccines antibody response); evolved pneumococcus serotypes, which evade the vaccine; and more are being documented.
Of course we get only official denials. “It’s not a problem, keep taking your shots.” As for the media, they just spew out what they are told to. But there are lots of honest doctors and scientists around the globe, finding awkward facts that contradict the official narrative. You’ll just never get to hear of their work.
Meanwhile they go on ranting and railing about the naughty people who won’t “follow the science”. Well, I follow the science; there isn’t any sometimes!
Just to finish:
Cod liver oil is recognized by the National Library of Medicine as a source of Vitamin A and can be obtained from eating fresh cod liver or by taking supplements. Fortune Business Insights notes that the “global cod liver oil market is projected to grow from $88.75 million (2022) to $162.86 million by 2029.”
Get some!
To Your Good Health,
Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor
