The Tragedy Of Angelina Jolie’s Tits

by ProfKeith

[Tits; short for teats, mammary glands, breasts]

jolie222

Medical science has moved forward to Mengele-style* Nazi mutilations, in the name of “medicine”. I am ashamed of my profession in this.To mutilate a woman’s body in the crazed belief that this is somehow helping her is beyond obscene or laughable; for once I can’t think of any words to fit.

Incompetence is one thing; ignorance is another; there is folly and delusion; but this? It beggars description.

Why am I so incensed?

Because it is unnecessary. It comes from fear and ignorance and the silly notion that genes are the ruling condition of health and that, once you have the gene, you are screwed, effectively.

I know different: I know that genes can be turned on and off easily, like a light switch. I have done it thousands of times. Genes mean almost nothing. In this case having the gene does not mean you will get breast cancer and moreover not having the gene still means that you could get the cancer.

YOU control your genes; or in this case, she does. So why pay attention to genes?

It appears the doctors have scared Angelina by claiming she has an 87% chance of developing breast cancer because it’s “in her genes” (her mother had the disease and died miserably). This is simply NOT true. The best that could be said of the stats is that, if you are foolish, don’t take care of your diet and lifestyle, like all the other idiots, your chances of getting cancer is as bad as theirs.

This scaremongering and abuse of statistics is part of the medical profession’s attempts to manipulate people and profits by creating fear. It’s criminal. They are, it is true, incompetent when it comes to cancer. But they won’t allow any natural healthy alternatives and so they are stuck with the idea that cancer is dreadful and very dangerous.

To protect their anti-Nature position, they pretend a science that does not exist. They ruthlessly steer the truth away from anything which they find inconvenient in their greedy world-view and no-one, not even a super star, is safe from their predations.

They call this “taking control” of the cancer. As if! As one cancer survivor angrily wrote about Jolie’s decision: Alas, my experience of cancer, and that of most patients and survivors that I know, is that having your cells and genes go haywire is an object lesson in lack of control. Our understanding of cancer is still tragically incomplete. Our treatments are still, frankly, rather barbaric. And the outcomes of treatment are still rather random.

But it’s worse. Let me tell you something that sickens me in this mutilation scenario. If a person has a disease miasm or other energetic program or field that predisposes sickness, IT WON’T GO AWAY! Instead, it will just find another expression. The disease you now “cannot get” just turns into a different disease.

They don’t measure this at all. They will smugly tell her: now you cannot possibly get breast cancer; you have no breasts. But they will not tell her whether they have ever measured to see if this brutal and expensive torture operation actually helps her lead a healthier and longer life. They don’t even know the answer!

I can answer that question from healing first principles: if in the future she is ill or sick to die, she will get something else. I just don’t know what.

Western medicine sails along oblivious to the real causes and mechanisms of disease. To them, everything is physical. A tumor is a tumor and the entire “problem”; they blindly cannot see that the lump is the RESULT of the problem!

As for the stupid women commentators who “praise” her brave and forward-thinking attitude; they are condemning fellow women to folly and mutilation, for no proper scientific result.

Make no mistake: the approach that “this might be a good idea” is NOT science. Science is when you show it does some good overall, when reviewed honestly and thoroughly. In the case of something this drastic, it is also incumbent on the advocates of the procedure to prove that no other option is available. They can never prove THAT, because it isn’t true!

Poor Angelina; poor, silly, deluded (and mutilated) Angelina!

PS. Reconstructive surgery is very good these days and I don’t doubt her plumptious breasts, even her nipples, are still up for fans to drool over. But that’s not really the point, is it?

*Josef Mengele was an SS physician, infamous for his inhumane medical experimentation upon concentration camp prisoners at Auschwitz.

You may also like:


{ 3 comments }

Dalyn May 20, 2013 at 6:11 pm

I wish this would be printed on the NYTimes op-Ed page.

Dennis Wonn May 23, 2013 at 7:24 am

My first thought about Angelina was “How tragic she listens to the wrong people”. All that money and influence have worked against her, leading her and Brad to the supposed “best medical experts”. WRONG!

However, there may be another angle to this story. She recently gave birth, is 38 years old, and her breasts could have been in declining condition, literally. Her thinking may have been to get rid of the risk and get a new pair of perky, perfect boobs which of course enhance her career.

ProfKeith May 23, 2013 at 7:36 am

Good one Dennis, yes, certainly could be true. I have not “followed” her mammaries. But my concern here is that she used her celebrity status to add credence to these onco crooks.
Meantime, if she laid them on my table, I could make an evaluation…

Comments on this entry are closed.