Don’t Bother, They’re Here!
[echoing the lyric of Stephen Sondheim’s “Send in The Clowns”]
There’s a lot of stuff coming out to make the medical profession squirm. So what do they do? Go into denial! Hire of few shills to pick apart the science and pretend it’s no good, while their “science” is impeccable. Aw, c’mon!
First Off:
CT scans cause cancer. A LOT of cancer. It reminds me of the old days of mass chest x-rays in the 1950s and 60s, looking for TB and lung cancer. It emerged that the mass x-ray program was CAUSING more cancers than it was finding. So the program was abandoned. But that was then; we don’t abandon lucrative programs these days, just because we are killing patients, Oh no!
Watch what happens. I bet you NOTHING happens. Or some shill will crawl out of the woodwork, to play around with the figures and prove it was all nonsense.
Truth is, according to a paper published in JAMA, CT scans could be causing up to 100,000 cancers a year, in the USA alone! That would be about 5% of cancers per year CAUSED by this diagnostic method.
True it was not a population study as such but a “risk assessment”. That doesn’t make it invalid. These forecasts have to be taken seriously and the approach to medicine reviewed. We don’t NEED that many CT scans and that’s a fact.
A risk model suggested that radiation from CT exams in 2023 were projected to lead to over 100,000 future cancers over the lifetime of the patients exposed that year.
Previous projections published in 2009 had estimated that approximately 29,000 future cancers would result from routine CT exposures.
These projections, and the frightening new 2023 figures, were reported by Rebecca Smith-Bindman, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, and her colleagues.
Risks were higher in children and adolescents, but higher CT utilization in adults accounted for most (91%) radiation-induced cancers.
See, CT scans use ionizing radiation (like x-rays). MRI scans and ultra-sound are much safer and don’t use radiation. But it’s going to be a tough sell, getting doctors to go back to using their skills and training, instead of just sending the patient off for a CT scan.
Worse still is that patients can be very demanding and insist on the CT scan. They believe that is the “best” available and won’t be fobbed off with something else.
Try explaining the concept of “low-value testing” to a distraught Mom!
And—you guessed it—the shills speak up on behalf of the very lucrative CT scan “industry”. They dismiss these projections as a “theoretical risk” and insist that modeling studies “are not based on actual patient outcomes.” Which of course mean they are defending their turf and are not going to budge.
“There are no published studies directly linking CT scans (even multiple CT scans) to cancer,” the American College of Radiology (ACR) claimed in response. “Americans should not forgo necessary, life-saving medical imaging and continue to discuss the benefits and risks of these exams with their healthcare providers.”
Smith-Bindman and colleagues acknowledged that the study had several limitations, including the fact that their risk estimated model parameters were based on Japanese survivor outcomes “…and questions remain about the transfer of radiation risks from the mid-20th century Japanese population to the current U.S. population.”1
Oh well, that’s it then. It’s only the Japanese. We can’t apply those figures to US human beings (please don’t write me, I’m being sarcastic, not a racist pig!)
Flu Vaccine Seems to INCREASE Disease!
Whoops, what a HUGE embarrassment. We’ve known for decades, of course, that the flu vaccine is useless. They never get the strains right for the year and, in any case, over 95% of flu cases don’t have flu (fact), they have an influenza-like illness ILI (not caused by one of the flu viruses).
So, to show that it’s not only not working but INCREASES your chances of an ILI is doubly humiliating. It shows up not only the shoddy science behind the flu vaccines but makes a fool out of all the doctors who support the nonsense and keep spouting that everyone must have a flu shot!
Call in the shills! Quick!
One of the first to rally to the cry was Jeremy Faust, editor-in-chief of MedPage Today, an emergency medicine physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and a public health researcher.
“Of course, people who are anti-vax, love to jump all over this,” he says. “It’s a stunning Cleveland Clinic… negative effectiveness study. What’s stunning about it is how bad it is. So if you don’t know that, you shouldn’t be in this space. Go back to writing fiction.”2
Arrogant little bastard.
But Faust fails to make his point convincingly. He waffles about susceptible depletion bias, bad science and the study authors who “aught to know better” but in the end, the unvaccinated group had a lower incidence of flu. Period.
In any case, even if specious tweaking of figures managed to bring the vaccinated group back on top, it means the two groups are very close. They shouldn’t be. According accepted wisdom there should be lots of cases in the unvaxxed group and NONE in the vaxxed group!
And of course this overlooks the actual patients harmed by the vaccine. Oh yes, there are none, I remember now… Vaccines are 100% safe! (now I’m being really sarcastic, get it?)
Now Comes The Worst Of It:
This one is too difficult to waffle and blur the pitch. This one will have to be retracted and it won’t be long before that happens, I predict; a matter of weeks I should say. Pfizer will bring immense pressure to bear to force the journal to “retract” the paper, so they can pretend it never happened.
But the secret is out. In a press conference on March 11, 2025, Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP, dropped a bombshell: all analyzed Pfizer and Moderna vaccine batches contain dangerously high levels of DNA, potentially transforming recipients into “genetically modified organisms.”
“In every single vial tested, there is an extremely high amount of DNA… stable compared to mRNA, can integrate into human DNA,” Kotlár asserted. “Theoretically, DNA fragments can integrate into the host genome, increasing the risk of genetic mutations.” Remember this guy is an MD, as well as a politician.3
Not just any old fragments of DNA but that from the SV40 virus. This finding raises urgent safety concerns, particularly due to the well-documented role of SV40 as a potential carcinogen.
This discovery not only highlights serious lapses in regulatory oversight for mRNA vaccines but also revives disturbing parallels to the polio vaccine scandal of the 1960s, where millions were unknowingly exposed to SV40. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) formerly hosted a page acknowledging this connection, but they have now taken it down. Tara! It never happened! It was just “misinformation” ahead of its time.
So authorities carry on blithely, as if nothing is wrong. They are STILL recommending old folks and the vulnerable get their COVID shots! No care or caution on view, anywhere…
Doesn’t it make you sick the way they protect their Pharma buddies and are quite prepared to kill or risk killing humans in the process?
The connection cannot be shrugged off because of the huge surge in cancers we are seeing, particularly very aggressive and rapidly-fatal cancers, which have been nicknamed “turbo-cancers”.
Instead of exercizing caution and putting a hold on these vaccines, official sites are quick to criticize detractors. BUT THEIR ARGUMENTS ARE NONSENSE.
The Australian TGA (equivalent of the FDA) waded in with the arguments that the samples are small (3 phials only in one of the labs). But just one phial is enough to establish contamination. Some samples were past their expiry date (so what? DNA is either present or not). Some may not have been stored “correctly” (so what? even kept at room temperature they would not articifically “grow” DNA!)
Finally, they try and discredit these labs by saying they are not properly authenticated for testing vaccines. They were not “testing vaccines”, they were looking for contaminants. Even college kids could do that, given the necessary equipment.4
These are the guys who whine about those who spread “misinformation”? The public should trust the science, they say? I don’t think so, not this kind of “science”.
This page was on CDC.gov, now deleted. But you can read the cached (archived) version here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/historical-concerns/index.html
You’ll find this para:
Simian Virus 40 (SV40): 1955 – 1963
“Because of research done with SV40 in animal models, there has been some concern that the virus could cause cancer in humans. However, most studies looking at the relationship between SV40 and cancers are reassuring, finding no causal association between receipt of SV40-contaminated polio vaccine and development of cancer.”
The key word there is “most”. It’s a sin that ANY SV40 virus particles should be in a polio vaccine! The argument “It’s OK, it doesn’t cause cancer,” is irrelevant. It’s also NOT TRUE. There is a known oncogenic (tumor causing) mechanism connected with the SV40 virus, which is that it suppresses the p53 gene, which is protective against cancer. As an example, SV40 definitely causes cancer in hamsters.5
Moreover, pleural mesotheliomas and osteosarcomas develop in hamsters injected intracardially with SV40.6
Is that important? Yes. We use hamsters in lab testing because their immune systems reespond quite like ours! So claims that it doesn’t apply to humans is disingenuous at best, outright lying more likely.
I’m really angry, as you can see. This is supposed to be the great calling of medicine. Yet these crooks are playing with human lives, just to protect their profits.
Look after yourself—and I mean that advisedly,
To your good health,
Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor
References:
-
- Smith-Bindman R, et al “Projected lifetime cancer risks from current computed tomography imaging” JAMA Intern Med 2025; DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0505.
- https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/faustfiles/115110
- https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-news-slovak-government-official
- https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/addressing-misinformation-about-excessive-dna-mrna-vaccines.
- M Carbone, R Stach, I Di Resta, H I Pass, P Rizzo. Simian virus 40 oncogenesis in hamsters. Dev Biol Stand. 1998 ;94:273-9. PMID:
- Cicala, C., Pompetti, F., & Carbone, M. (1993). SV40 induces mesotheliomas in hamsters. The American Journal of Pathology, 142(5), 1524–1533. PMID: 8388174; PMCID: PMC1886912.
